As I was running through some headlines on RedState this weekend, I saw one that gave me pause: “US To Sell F-16 Fighters to People’s Republic of Vietnam.”
I’m a pretty simple man, and I live by simple rules. (The 10 commandments and the Golden Rule. Your word is your bond; the best defense is a good offense; you don’t put ketchup on a hot dog, etc.) And when it comes to political questions, if a country’s name starts with “People’s Republic of” the answer is usually a hard NOPE!
Especially when the question starts with, “Should we sell weapons to…,” you pretty much have me at “people’s republic.”
However, the article suggests that since Vietnam has some ongoing tensions and conflict with China, this might be a worthwhile move, if only because it updates the old realpolitik truism that “the commie enemy of my much worse commie enemy is my friend.”
Color me skeptical. When you attach the “people’s republic” label, and the fact that this deal is being explored by the reverse-Midases of the Biden administration (i.e. everything they touch turns to shite), you’re already got two strikes.
But if it means potentially making life harder for the Chicoms, I’m listening. Still, we should demand receipts.
I saw what I think is some good news and some bad news for Trump this past week, and both reminded me of how much I despise the national Democrats.
One bit of mixed news was Trump’s 90-minute interview with Megyn Kelly on 9/12, which contained both good Trump and bad Trump.
After the interview, Kelly had the great Victor Davis Hanson on to discuss it, and he had it about right, as he reliably does: Trump is so much better and less deserving of scorn than Biden that it is a national shame that he’s being treated the way he is while Biden is getting the kid gloves treatment. (That’s my paraphrase of VDH, who along with Thomas Sowell is one of the wisest living Americans, IMHO.)
But he also acknowledged the weakness of some of Trump’s responses, including a non-response on what he’s doing now to stop the steal next time, and the fact that his skipping the GOP debates now is going to make it harder for him to insist that Biden absolutely must debate him in the general, and a few others.
When asked about why he showed such deference to Fauci until the end of his term, including giving him a presidential commendation on his last day in office, Trump said, “I don’t know who gave him the commendation.” (Um, you did. In a face-to-face ceremony, when you were the president. Which as the name “presidential commendation” suggests, is traditionally given by the president.)
Kelly ended that question by asking, “Wouldn’t you just like a do-over on that?” Some might see that as snarky phrasing, but to me it was a slow pitch over the plate, and I was just begging to hear him say the obvious:
“Yes, I’m fallible like everyone else, and knowing what I know now, I wish I would have followed my correct instincts (I said it was from a Chinese lab early on, etc.) and sidelined Fauci very early on. I’ve learned valuable lessons from my devious enemies in the first term, and I’ll use that knowledge to do even better in my second.”
The good news for Trump is in the polls. He continues to lead the GOP field by huge margins that appear to be growing, which is nothing new. But for the first time, I’ve seen a “mainstream” poll – this one from the WAPO – showing Trump with a sizeable 10-point lead against Biden in the general. Right now that’s an outlier, but if other polls begin to show the same results, it will ease the concerns of a lot of conservatives who fear Trump will lose the general. (Like me, for instance.)
On the other hand, CO’s thesis (which I agree with) is that if it starts looking like Biden is clearly going to lose the election to Trump (or any other GOP nominee, for that matter) — if it’s a close call, the national Dems will use all of their trademarked chicanery to steal it – the Dems will force Biden out.
They’ll replace him with Newsom (D-Barbie World), or Michelle Obama (Defensive End, Arkansas State), or some other leftist whose egregious flaws are much less known than Biden’s.
I’m afraid that strategy may work, because the Dems always do worse when the spotlight is on their candidate and their policies.
The Left’s natural enemy is sunlight/exposure. The twin pillars of their recent campaigns are slandering their opponents (racists, sexists, bigots, fascists, etc.) and clothing their own candidates in vague and glittering generalities and platitudes (he’s for the working class, she loves diversity, etc.)
The first strategy is a given, and as long as they control the MSM, it will always give them outsized returns. But the second one is risky, primarily because the reality of their policies is disastrous, and exposure to sunlight will doom them. Examples abound.
Offering “sanctuary” to abstract and noble immigrants sounds great; actually watching millions of illegals descend on your cities and break all of your infrastructure (education, social services, hospitals, prisons, etc.) makes even deep-blue mayors shriek, “It’s destroying our city!”
Talking about “Bidenomics” in the abstract is not nearly as bad as watching your mortgage rate double, and paying a king’s ransom for a bag of groceries and a gallon of gas.
Talking in abstract terms about “trans rights” or “women’s health care” sounds good; seeing a hulking dude with a creepy fetish in your grade-school daughter’s bathroom and taxpayer funding of late-term infanticide, not so much.
Talking about the joys of “renewable energy” sours pretty quickly when you’re confronted by a giant mound of bird corpses at the base of a wind turbine, black-outs and brown-outs in a first-world nation, and utility bills that are as high as Hunter Biden in a roomful of hookers.
The same thing goes for their candidates. Biden stayed in his basement in 2020, because the more people saw him, the more they disliked him. Hillary did much the same in 2016; everyone says her main mistake was not going to WI or a couple of other states that the Dems didn’t believe were in range for Trump, but I’m convinced they’re wrong. Wherever she went she brought her inherent repulsiveness with her, so I don’t see why her showing up and CAW-CAWing at the cheeseheads would have helped her prospects there.
The horrible Katie Hobbs is governor of AZ now because she was able to hide and refuse to debate her much more intelligent and nimble opponent. Fetterman almost lost his election when his one, late debate showed that he couldn’t talk or think. (Fortunately for him, Oz was an uninspiring RINO, and the PA Dem machine rigged the rest.)
For all of these reasons, the GOP candidate would be best served in ’24 by doing enough to highlight his differences with the Dems’ policies, and then keeping the spotlight on Biden, or whichever Dem takes his place.
In this sense, I think Ben Shapiro (and others) have it right: if ’24 is primarily about Biden, Trump wins; but if ’24 is primarily about Trump, Biden wins.
And that’s why – all of my appreciation for Trump’s accomplishments during his presidency aside – I’m worried that he might have a special weakness, in that by his inclination and the Left’s design, he is always going to be the primary focus of attention in any election he’s in.
That will help with some voters, but for the rest, I hope that all of conservative media and all of us can keep the spotlight on the leftist candidates and policies that have wreaked so much havoc these last several years.
Have a good week, everybody!
Biden delenda est!
“Dr.” Jill Biden/Tony “The Science” Fauci, 2024!