As enjoyable as it is to make fun of leftists when they beclown themselves, we also need to call balls and strikes on our side too. And I have to do that now with Tucker Carlson, who has sadly joined Jonah Goldberg as one of my formerly favorite voices on the right who has gone off the rails.
Within the last year I’ve written about Tucker doing some inexplicably bad interviews. He talked with a weirdo named Darryl Cooper – Carlson called him “the best and most honest popular historian” – who claimed that Churchill (not Hitler) was the chief villain of WWII, and that the Nazis killed millions of POWs out of pity, to save them from starving to death.
Because the Nazis were known for nothing more than their humanitarian compassion for the sub-human untermenschen.
Tucker also did a shockingly sycophantic interview with Putin, in which he praised the magnificence of a Soviet Potemkin subway station, and the cleanliness and great prices in a similarly phony Moscow grocery store.
His recent debate/interview with Ted Cruz was another low point. He used cheap gotcha questions, bad faith arguments and ad hominem attacks in the service of a utopian, anti-war stance that he contradicted a few minutes later. When he asked Cruz what Iran’s population is and Cruz admitted he didn’t know, Carlson adopted an exaggerated astonishment, asking how Cruz could justify going to war with Iran when he doesn’t even know the population.
The debate was about the wisdom and risks of Trump potentially striking Iran’s nuke facilities, and Cruz asked the obvious question of what difference it would make, in that context, whether Iran’s population is 80, 90 or 100 million? Carlson snapped, “If you don’t know anything about the country—” and when Cruz objected, Carlson asked what the ethnic breakdown of Iran was.
Cruz (correctly) answered that it is Persian and mostly Shia, but then refused to play Tucker’s game further. Carlson accused Cruz of not believing that Iran has tried to kill Trump – a pretty well-established fact, I think – or else he would have supported going to war with Iran beforehand. Eventually Cruz got Tucker to reveal how dishonest he was being, when Tucker said that if HE believed that Iran had tried to kill Trump, he’d support nuking Tehran!
This following months of Tucker virtue signaling about how he was against even one person ever dying in a war, and calling people “warmongers” and “ghouls” if they supported Israel’s strikes to take out Iran’s nukes and top military personnel.
Hey Tucker, around 9 million people live in Tehran. Even my weak, English professor math tells me that that’s roughly 9 million times the one single person you would never want to see die in a war.
Tucker’s rhetorical games avoided the real issues that the debate should have focused on: Has Iran been sponsoring terrorist attacks on Israel, America and her allies throughout the Middle East for years? (Yes!) Are the Iranian weird beards racing to get a nuclear weapon? (Yes again!) Are they likely to use such a bomb to dominate the region and threaten our allies and interests? (Hell yes!)
Tucker ignored the (glowing) elephant in the room, instead arguing that Cruz’s position is corrupt and evil because he doesn’t know that Iranians’ favorite food is chelo kebab, and that their top three turns-ons are moonlit walks in the desert, a well-defined unibrow (on a man or woman), and paying others to murder Jews.
Oddly enough, Carlson’s breathless predictions of the resulting apocalypse if Trump struck Iran’s nuclear sites – A forever war! An American ground invasion with mountains of casualties! Russian and China jumping in on Iran’s side! – were quickly proven to be ridiculous hysteria.
Unexpectedly!
But Carlson’s cage-match interview with Ted Cruz looks even worse when compared to the obsequious tongue-bath he just gave to Iran’s president, a man whose name is not even worth my time to look up, since he’s a powerless puppet of the radical ayatollahs who actually rule Iran.
Carlson went after Cruz hammer and tongs, like Thor after drinking a flagon of mead dosed with cocaine and meth. (Mmmm, meth-mead…) But when he talked with Mahmoud the Grouch (on-point puppet reference), Tucker sounded like Oprah interviewing Que Mala. No follow-ups, no challenges. Just a series of questions with no pushback whatsoever, no matter how outrageous the lies being spouted.
There are a dozen examples, but I’ll just cite two that made me shake my head so hard I was in danger of becoming self-concussed. (In the commentary business, we call this, “Pulling a Crockett.”)
When the prez claimed that Iran has never and is not now trying to build a nuclear bomb – only clean, green, oh-so-civilian nuclear power – Tucker was silent. He didn’t ask, “Why would the world’s most oil-rich nation need nuclear power?” Or “Why have you already enriched uranium to the 60% range when civilian use only requires 3-5%?” or even, “Who buries a civilian power plant hundreds of yards under a freaking mountain?!”
Later, Tucker did manage to ask him what’s up with the constant “death to America” chants.
And Jihadi Lambchop (puppet reference for the over-60 crowd, and Shari Lewis enthusiasts) says that it doesn’t mean “Death to America.” Don’t be silly. It really means death to “crimes, to killing and carnage, to insecurity and stability… [and to] “bullying.”
Got that? “Death to bullying.” Because who amongst us, when we see bullying going on – or insecurity, too! – doesn’t race up behind the bullying, pull its head back, and cut its head off with our scimitar, while screaming, “Death to bullying!?”
If that doesn’t make you say, “WTF?” or “You’ve got to be Schiff-ing me!” that’s because you’re not Tucker Carlson. Who just nodded and moved on.
Watching this made me miss the old Tucker I thought I knew. But on the bright side, it also taught me something about the Iranian president: If Jeff Dunham ever fires him from his gig as Achmed the Dead Terrorist’s sidekick (and there’s the puppet reference hat-trick, my narwhals!), his skill at torturing the language qualifies him to land a tenured position at Harvard as the new occupant of the Bill Clinton Chair for Post-Modern Deconstructionist Prevaricating.
That job comes with a six-figure salary, all the interns you can grope, and some sweet stationery with an embossed illustration from the Kama Sutra under the position’s Latin motto: “Pendeat ex quid significat ‘est’ ‘est’.”
(In English: “It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ ‘is’.”)
Rather than leaving you on that down note, I’ll close with my favorite comedy story from the last week in June. (I know that was last month. I’m mocking as fast as I can!)
You might remember Jamaal Bowman from that time when he was the congressman who pulled a fire alarm to prevent a House vote that the Democrats were going to lose. When it turned out that his devious act was caught on camera, his defense was – did I mention that he was a former school principal? – “I don’t know how fire alarms work.”
So he lost his next election – unexpectedly! – and has now been reduced to selling his blood, collecting cans, and appearing on CNN panels.
In his most recent CNN appearance, he announced that he’s made a breakthrough medical discovery that might hurt my chances of getting the Nobel Prize for Medicine (for my Simpson Gender Confirmation Protocol™ – see yesterday’s column). If he edges me out, I’m going to be at the end of my rope. Especially after I’ve been runner-up for People Magazine’s Sexiest Man of the Year for the last 20 years running!
(George Clooney? I get it. Chris Hemsworth? Understood. But John Krasinski? Now you’re just rubbing salt in my wounds, People Magazine!)
Where was I? Oh yeah.
Jamaal Bowman has discovered the cause of heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity in the African-American community. And he rushed straight from the laboratory to CNN to explain, in this quote which I swear to you I am not making up:
“You can’t be calm about this! I’m a black man in America! The reason why heart disease and cancer and obesity and diabetes are bigger in the black community is because of the stress we carry from having to deal with being called the N-word directly or indirectly every day.”
And before you can ask: No, he is not talking about the word “narwhal.” But the fine people at COOSP (the Cautious Optimism Office of Standards and Practices) have asked me to proceed as if he is.
Sure, at first glance this quote would appear to suggest that Jamaal Bowman is a race-hustling, imbecilic grifter. At second glance, too. But if you hang in there long enough, at around glance number 147 or so, Bowman’s theory starts to make sense.
So I’ve spent the last 3 weeks researching his claims. I decided that heart disease is tougher to quantify quickly, so I focused on cancer, diabetes and obesity. I found 1000 black volunteers and exposed them to various sources of n-word exposure, and calculated how much each exposure would increase tumors, blood sugar levels, and weight gain.
Here are my preliminary results, adjusted per capita:
Reading Huckleberry Finn (one of the main characters is named “Narwhal Jim,” so…) – 1 tumor, a 10 mg/dl increase in blood sugar, and 4 pounds of added weight.
Watching Pulp Fiction’s “dead narwhal storage” scene – 2 tumors, 15 mg of blood sugar, 10 extra pounds
Watching Richard Pryor “Live on the Sunset Strip” – 5 tumors, 30 mg blood sugar, 30 pounds
Watching any Dave Chappell Netflix Special – 6 tumors, 70 mg, 50 pounds
My research found a little good news, because as with many medical conditions, some people are more susceptible than others. Sure, for bitter racial hypochondriacs like Joy Reid or Whoopi Goldberg, just hearing a conversation about the west African nation of Niger is close enough to cause a skin rash and 5 pounds of weight gain.
Meanwhile, role model and great man Clarence Thomas – who has been called a “house narwhal” by half the malevolent leftists in academia and the MSM thousands of times – is still strong like bull.
Anyway, I’ve got bad news and worse news for Jamaal Bowman.
The bad news is that even though Hippocratic-oath-related concerns forced me to cut my final test short, that one produced the highest rate of TVNE (Toxic Verbal Narwhal Exposure), which resulted from listening to a complete album by any rapper other than Kid Rock.
To wit: head-to-toe metastatic cancer, more sugar than a super-sized Mountain Dew/ice cream float, and weight class: Pritzker.
The worse news is the Recommended Course of Treatment: spend more time around white people.
I can hear Jamaal now: The cure is worse than the disease!
Hamas delenda est!