Before I get started today, I want to let everyone know that I’ve made another short video – this one on the topic of our crazies vs Democrat crazies — which I’ve posted on my website (Martinsimpsonwriting.com). You can find it under “Videos” at the top of the screen.
It’s a little different than the ones I made before, and it contains several added features: a small portrait of Cassie the Wonder Dog; a chance to see my scraggly poison ivy beard before I shave it off, and a very brief cameo from the late great Sam Kinison. So check it out if you’re so inclined, and let me know what you think.
On to the usual political malarky.
I’ve still got a column on immigration on tap, but I couldn’t miss the chance to mock a few of our leftist antagonists before posting that one… starting with the Good-Year Governor of my old home state of Illinois, J.B. Pritzker.
He gave a speech last week at the lefty thinktank Center for American Progress, in DC. (He kept calling them “CAP,” and I’m sure that I’m not the only one who keep instinctively adding an understood “dunce” before the CAP.)
He wants to waddle for president in 2028 – which would be easier for him if he wasn’t running Illinois into the ground – and his 20-minute speech and subsequent Q&A was an early step down that road. I’d like to tell you that I watched the whole presentation, but even my prodigious will power is not inexhaustible.
But I watched most of it, and that was enough to conclude that he’s no worse than most national Democrats right now. (You can find that description beside “damning with faint praise” in a dictionary of common sayings.) He can speak in complete sentences, but only if they are filled with a combination of banalities and fashionable progressive lies.
He attacked Elon as a wealthy oligarch, apparently forgetting that he inherited his own billions from mommy and daddy, and used a portion of that wealth to buy a governor’s seat. He also attacked Trump because he heartlessly withheld masks and ventilators which would have saved the lives of many people in the early days of covid, purely because Trump “[sees] people’s lives [as] a game.”
Which would have been a great point, if we didn’t already know that Trump didn’t do that, and that masks and ventilators didn’t save people’s lives any more than draconian Democrat lockdowns did. Beyond that, Pritzker offers only glittering generalities, and dishonest insults of conservatives.
The presentation was billed as, “Pritzker Drops the Hammer on Trump and Musk for ‘Cruel and Incompetent Recklessness.’” I couldn’t help thinking that “Cruel and Incompetent Recklessness” would be a great campaign slogan for what the Dems have done to Chicago and Illinois over these last several decades.
And I think Pritzker would do a lot better for himself if he tried dropping a fork and spoon for a change, instead of a hammer.
Speaking of dropping a hammer, I came across a social media post by Tim Miller – a former RINO and current weasel who writes for the never-Trumper site The Bulwark – which quickly resulted in him being hammered from all sides.
Miller captioned a link to Musk’s DOGE interview with Bret Baier, this way: “Prepare to be lectured to by a guy who has never pleased a woman.”
Which is doubly rich, considering that Musk has about 114 children (which presumably means that he’s pleasured at least a woman or two in time), and that Tim Miller is not exactly the kind of fella whose entry into a room results in a wave of panties automatically dropping. And that’s before you take into account that Miller is gay.
A more skeptical guy might ask how Miller even has the chutzpah to opine on what it takes to please a woman in the first place. But not me. Because I can easily imagine Miller walking toward a group of women, who all look at him and think, “Oh boy. What’s it going to take to get rid of this creep?”
But then one of them whispers to the others, “That’s Tim Miller. And he’s super gay.”
And just like that, all of the women in the group are pleased that he won’t be hitting on them. So good job, Tim. Because just by being gay, I’m sure that you’ve pleased way more than your share of women.
My favorite story of the last week was NPR’s CEO Katherine Maher testifying in front of a House committee. Maher is a standard-issue AWFL, and exactly who you’d expect to be the CEO of NPR. Or PBS. Or some crooked leftist NGO.
She had to face the worst situation a public official can endure: being questioned by competent people who have the facts at their disposal, when you have left an obvious paper trail proving that you are clearly guilty of everything they’re about to expose you on.
Unfortunately for her, she doesn’t seem to have been sharp enough to realize any of that. After posting endless tweets about her super-white New England upbringing, and how she’s woke enough to condemn her northern neighbors for their complicity in the slave trade centuries ago, I couldn’t help but think of another New England tradition: putting bad actors in a pillory in the town square.
But this was even better. Because it was like they locked her head and hands in place, and then GOP officials started paddling her, while the angry crowd threw rotten fruit and vegetables at her head.
Her testimony had it all, including ridiculous assertions, unconvincing confessions, and bald-faced lies.
When asked why she’d called Trump a “deranged racist sociopath,” she said that she regretted her words today. I’ll bet she does, after November 6th!
Brandon Gill went to work on her, and it was beautiful to watch. He asked whether she believes that “America believes in black plunder and white democracy,” which she had tweeted in reference to a book she loved called The Case for Reparations.
Maher not only denied that she believed what she tweeted, she said she’d never read that book. Then Gill read her tweet, which said, “I appreciate the day off today to finally fully read The Case for Reparations.”
D’oh!
She also denied knowing of a book called “In Defense of Looting.” Until…wait for it… Gill read the tweet she posting saying that she’d read that book.
When Gill asked her, “Do you think that white people should pay reparations?”
Finally, she gave a definitive answer. “I have never said that, sir.”
And Gill brought the paddle down hard. “Yes you did. You said it in January 2020. You tweeted, “Yes, the North, yes all of us, yes America. Yes, our original collective sin and unpaid debt. Yes, reparations. Yes, on this day.”
Yikes. That’s Harry-met-Sally level stuff. Except that none of us will have what she’s having!
She finally fell back to repeatedly saying that, “My views have evolved since then.” And eye rolling could be heard throughout DC.
Especially when she denied that NPR is politically biased. Which was followed immediately by Jim Jordan pointing out that in the DC area, editorial positions at NPR have 87 registered Democrats and zero Republicans. Ms. Maher was shocked – Shocked! – to hear that.
As much fun as it was to watch Maher getting hoist on her own petard, the larger issue is that NPR and PBS should obviously be defunded, for many reasons.
First, even if it wasn’t obviously politically biased, there is no reason to force Americans to support government tv and radio channels. There are tv channels for every interest under the sun, from cooking to travel to Korean soccer to fishing to game shows. And PBS’s worthwhile shows – my wife watches Antiques Roadshow, and we both like Rick Steve’s travel stuff – would be snapped up and shown on regular, free-market channels.
Second, they are obviously biased, and that’s doubly insulting in a country that is politically divided.
Third, it’s typical of the totalitarian streak on the left that they would expect us to pay for their propaganda. Conservatives are glad that our right to own guns is in the constitution, but we’d never expect that American lefties should be forced to buy our guns for us. And we appreciate conservative outlets like Fox and the Daily Wire, but we’d never expect American lefties to have to pay for those.
But it’s not enough for lefties to pretend that their right to abort their children is in the constitution – they’ve got to force us to pay for those procedures, which we find morally repugnant.
Similarly, it’s not enough for lefties to demand their own tv and radio networks. We must be forced to pay for the whispering androgynous soy people to spread their soporific propaganda on our dime.
Finally, the one refrain you hear constantly from advocates for NPR and PBS is that government money makes up such a small part of their funding that it’s barely worth talking about.
I think it’s time to treat them like Katherine Maher, and call their bluff. Because if the taxpayer “contribution” is so small, I’m sure they’ll never miss it.
Hamas delenda est!