The Dems are up to their Old Tricks: Another Phony ICE Story, and the Two Dan Sullivans (posted 11/2/26)

I don’t know what’s going to happen in the midterms tomorrow.  If the polls are right, we’re going to get stomped.  Fortunately, the polls are rarely right, and they’re usually wrong in one direction.  My guess is that we lose the House, but my gut says that we narrowly hold the Senate. 

But who wants to listen to my guesses or my gut?

So rather than offering a lot of prognosticating that is worth what you’d pay for it, I’m going to overlook the manifest deficiencies on our side of things and focus on a very compelling reason to not sit this one out: the terribleness of our opponents. 

Specifically, I’ve got two stories to illustrate the kind of endemic corruption in the MSM and the Democrat party (but I repeat myself) that should motivate all of us to get out and vote against them: the latest “ICE-stapo brutally arrests husband/father/brain-surgeon/saint” story, and the fake Dan Sullivan election fraud scheme in Alaska.

By this time, we’ve all seen dozens of legacy media hagiographies of innocent people who left their wallet in their other pants, and thus were “undocumented” when the orcs from ICE descended on them and threw them into the back of a windowless panel van before they could finish their shift volunteering at the shelter that rescues golden retriever puppies suffering from canine scoliosis and renal failure.

So we know that when we hear about a “Maryland Dad,” the story is really about a human trafficking gang-banger with a colorful “El Diablo” tattoo stretching to cover both clavicles.  Just as we can be sure that a riot described as “a mostly peaceful protest” is going to leave more burned buildings than Dresden circa 1945.

And yet the legacy media can’t help themselves; they just keep lying.  Hence a Washington Post story from last Wednesday, with the headline, “ICE Detained a Middle-School Coach. His Players Say They Want Him Home.”

To be fair to the creepy sleazebags at WAPO, the Venezuelan referred to was actually a middle school coach.  But people can be more than one thing, and sometimes focusing on that one thing misses the main point by a country mile.

Which is why you don’t start a news story with, “John Wayne Gacy, adorable children’s-party clown…” or “Local vegetarian and proud German Shepherd owner Adolf Hitler…” or “Harvey Weinstein, movie buff,…”

Anyway, the Venezuelan name-hog in question is Amaury Jose Monsalve Figuera, but I’m going to call him Murray.  Because it amuses me, and because four names are too many. 

Murray may have originally come to the States legally, although “he did allegedly withhold information from immigration officials” and thus was in the middle of deportation proceedings when he recently ran a red light in DC.

No, we don’t deport people for running red lights, Dana Bash.  Let me finish.

After he was pulled over, the cops found “an unregistered handgun, ammunition, an open container of alcohol, and a bag of cocaine.”

Or as Hunter Biden calls it, “Tuesday.”  (If the pistol had been an illegal AK-47 and there had been three hookers of various nationalities in the back seat, that would have been “Saturday.”)

How does the WAPO handle these details?  Honestly, I don’t know, because the story is behind a pay wall, and it violates my personal ethics to pay a single penny to the trolls at the Washington Post.  But I saw the picture accompanying the story, which featured Mrs. Murray and the sainted Murray, who has a winsome smile and a sparkle in his eye. 

Although your eyes might sparkle too, if you were coked to the gills.

And the article begins this way: “To the young baseball players at D.C.’s Alice Deal Middle School, Amaury Monsalve is known as “Coach A,” a fixture of the local community who families say has brought championships, life lessons and joy….”

Yes!  Championships and joy! 

And booze, a pistol with no serial number but two bodies on it, and a bag of blow.  Hooray!

And how does congressman Rob Menendez, D-Corruptistan, start his tweet about good ol’ Murray?  “Kids playing little league should be focused on the game – not living in fear of ICE.”

It’s a cliché because it’s true: we don’t hate the media enough.

Meanwhile in Alaska, the Democrats – who you may have heard just LOVE our sacred democracy – have been caught trying to make a mockery out of democracy in a Senate race by running a phony Dan Sullivan to steal votes from the real GOP Dan Sullivan. 

The MSM hacks have beclowned themselves as they try to figure out how to react to the story.  Their first repeated talking point was that while the phony Sullivan ploy might be dishonest, it’s not illegal.  But that is as lame as it sounds, and not a great take for a party pretending to be more ethical than the opponents they’ve demonized as…dishonest.  (D’oh!)

Pitiable dimwit Ana Navarro tried to make the case that the GOP has done this kind of thing in the past too, pointing to a 2020 race in Florida.  In that case, a GOP pol named Frank Artiles recruited a schlub with the last name Rodriguez to run in a close house race against a Dem candidate with the last name of Rodriguez.  Around 3200 people voted for the fake Rodriguez, and the actual GOP candidate won the race by a few dozen votes.  Artiles was stupid enough to brag about what he’d done at an after-party, and he was charged with election fraud, along with the fake Rodriguez.  They were both convicted, and while Rodriguez did a year of house arrest and then probation due to a plea deal, Artiles did 60 days in jail, plus 5 years of probation and 500 hours of community service.

Ana is so thick that she admitted that Artiles was tried and convicted, without seeming to realize that she thereby destroyed the case she was trying to make.  “Republicans do it too!” doesn’t work if the Republicans charged, convicted and jailed their scammer, while Ana and the Dems are trying to defend and help theirs to succeed!

Hilariously enough, it turns out that the Democrats have used this same trick in the past.  The sainted JFK’s 1946 congressional campaign paid a janitor named Joseph Russo to enter a race against his opponent named Joe Russo to split the vote.  JFK won going away anyway, so the cheating turned out to be just an extra insurance policy against ethical democracy.  (Which leftists seem to disdain on general principal, IMHO.)  However, JFK faced a severe public and political backlash from Democrats nationwide after this transparently sleazy fraud.

HA!  I kid because I love. 

Of course JFK faced no blowback from his side.  Because: Democrats!  And spoiler alert, that cheater went on to eventually become the president of these United States.

Fun fact: his VP, the racist creep who succeeded him in the presidency – LBJ – launched HIS political career by stuffing a ballot box in his 1948 Texas Senate primary, a contest that he won by only 87 votes.  His fraud wasn’t particularly clever, either: one of his crooked minions (if not LBJ himself?) added 202 votes in one county after the polls had closed.  In a 50/50 contest, 200 of those 202 votes went for LBJ; they were also recorded in the same handwriting and in alphabetical order! 

The odds of that happening legitimately are the same as the odds of Ilhan Omar/Elmi telling the truth about her marital history under questioning from Brandon Gill.  “We have a DNA report here from Incestry.com that suggests…”

So the rich Democrat tradition of voting fraud – see Tammany Hall; Huey Long; every Chicago mayoral campaign since 1840; Frank “the Lout” Lautenberg’s senate campaign in NJ in 2002; every Chicago alderman campaign since 1840; JFK’s mafia chum Sam Giancana allegedly helping to steal Illinois’ presidential vote in 1960; Nithya Raman’s miraculous “comeback” to knock Spencer Pratt out of the run-off for LA mayor 20 minutes ago; the fake Dan Sullivan’s phony campaign right this minute, etc. – also led to two successive frauds becoming President. 

A third Dem prez (Bill Clinton) was also involved in a multiple-name scam that went on for several decades.  But in his case, it involved him banging a baker’s dozen of co-eds and interns named “Susan,” along with 10 Kates, Sarahs and Jennifers (each), plus 4 Candys (3 of them strippers) and at least one Monica.  Also, 4 Michelles.  (But not Michelle Obama.  Because that Arkansas horndog is only into chicks.) (Allegedly.)  

On the other hand, to be fair, Jimmy Carter was admirably faithful to Rosalynn, God bless him.  Unfortunately, that allowed him to devote 100% of his energy and focus to being a terrible, terrible president.  And boy did he knock that one out of the park.

In conclusion, c’mon!  Even if your GOP rep is no great shakes, get out there and vote.  Because the alternative is unutterably awful.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I’ve never made a dime on the inspirational speaker circuit. 

Hamas – and the Dems – delenda est.

0-0-0

If you enjoyed this column, please share it and the Cautious Intelligence site.  Also, please click Subscribe (on the bottom of your phone screen, or the right side of your computer screen) to receive a notice when new columns post.

The Democrat Elite Hate Democracy (posted 4/24/26)

If you’re like me – and what a great world this would be if everybody was – you were very irritated throughout 2024 by two constantly repeated talking points from Democrats and media talking heads (but I repeat myself): “no one is above the law,” and “we are fighting for democracy!”

Both phrases, of course, were false. Because: elite Democrat talking points.

By “no one is above the law,” Dems meant, “No Republicans – and especially Trump — are above the law.” And by “the law” they meant, “whatever we can falsely claim that the law is.”

On the other hand, the Dems created an immense scaffolding of double standards to exempt themselves and their minions from being subject to our laws. They’ve shamefully done everything possible to ensure that EVERYONE on their side is above the law.

Did Hunter Biden film himself breaking many laws against the use of drugs and prostitutes? Did he also launder millions of dollars from the Chicoms and corrupt Ukranian oligarchs – not to mention from “selling” those execrable paintings of his – in violation of various laws? Did “president” Biden accept at least 10% of those illegal funds? Did various Biden family +

members also illegally profit from their political connections to the Cadaver in Chief?

Obviously, in all cases. And rather than insisting that any of those lawbreakers face legal consequences, Joey Gaffes gave them all pardons on his way out the door. Just to be doubly sure that all of them remained above the law.

Of course the most glaring examples of this creepy double standard is the 15-20 million illegals whom the Biden administration illegally welcomed in! All Dem elites constantly argue that illegals should be above the law. They shouldn’t be held responsible for the crime of sneaking in, of working illegally, of driving illegally, of receiving all forms of welfare (except emergency medical services) illegally, or of committing additional violent crimes.

ALL of them should be above the law, and you’re a xenophobic racist if you disagree.

For a long time, “no one is above the law” was the most infuriating Democrat lie to me. But in recent weeks, the “we are the defenders of democracy” has taken top honors. Or, I guess, top dishonors.

The Democrats are obviously doing their best to routinely thwart the democratically expressed will of the people. How could they not, when they’ve consistently taken the “20” end of so many 80-20 issues?

The vast majority of Americans want biological males to be kept out of female bathrooms and locker rooms, and prevented from competing against females in sports. Similarly large majorities want to require voter IDs in elections, and for our border to be closed, and for all violent illegals to be deported. In all of those cases, though, the Dems have done everything possible to oppose the democratic process.

For decades, the Dems have happily used the courts to give them by judicial dictat what they could not win at the ballot box, from school busing to gay marriage to over-regulation to governmentally-approved racial discrimination against Asians and whites. They’re doing the same thing now, cheering every partisan local judge who tries to stop Trump from carrying out the duties of the executive, on whatever flimsy legal reasoning those hacks can find.

Trump’s stunning second election should have given the Dems pause. He won a lopsided victory in the electoral college, and even won the popular vote. If the left actually revered “democracy,” they wouldn’t have immediately tried to delegitimize his victory and oppose every single Trump action. Yet that is exactly what they’ve done.

But the most outrageously dishonest example of recent Democrat hypocrisy has come from the way they’ve handled the issue of gerrymandering congressional voting districts.

To grant the obvious point, gerrymandering is not illegal, and the practice has been around for centuries. Part of the reward of holding an electoral majority when reapportionment happens is to be able to draw borders that will help your party’s prospects in future elections. But that power is obviously open to abuse, and in our messy democratic system, there has usually been an unwritten, gentleman’s agreement that both parties will not abuse the system completely, giving themselves electoral advantages far out of proportion to the partisan breakdown of their state’s citizenry.

But you may have noticed that there are few gentlemen – or gentle-ladies, or gentle-he-shes – left in congress these days. And thus we find the Democrats in blue states doing everything they can to corruptly gerrymander the GOP voters’ voices out of existence.

Before any lefties in the audience can argue that both parties do it, I’ll point you to some actual facts. I’ve chosen 5 of the most prominent Democrat states, and 5 of the most prominent GOP states (some because they are contemplating gerrymandering now).

Here are the GOP states:

Texas – went for Trump over Harris in 2024 by 64%-34%; House seat percentages are 66% GOP to 34% Dem

Tennessee – went for Trump over Harris in 2024 by 64%-34%; House seat percentages are 89% GOP to 11% Dem (8 of 9)

Ohio – went for Trump over Harris in 2024 by 55%-44%; House seat percentages are 66% GOP to 33% Dem

Missouri – went for Trump over Harris in 2024 by 59%-40%; House seat percentages are 75% GOP to 25% Dem

Florida – went for Trump over Harris in 2024 by 56%-43%; House seat percentages are 71% GOP to 29% Dem

You can detect the bias toward the party in power by considering how much their opponents’ House seat percentage under-represents the opposition party’s share of the presidential vote. 40% of Missouri voters were Democrats, yet Dems only held 25% of Missouri House seats, a deficit of 15%. In Florida, 43% of voters were Dems, but only 29% of the House seats, a deficit of 14%. Ohio was closer, with a 11% Dem deficit (44% of the voters, but only 33% of the House seats). TN is trickier, because with only 1 of 9 House seats going to Dems, the deficit is 23% (34% of the vote to just 11% of House seats). Texas had actually zero bias, as 34% of both the vote and House seats belonging to Dems.

Here are the Dem states:

NY – went for Harris over Trump in 2024 by 54%-43%; House seat percentages are 73% Dem to 27% GOP

IL – went for Harris over Trump in 2024 by 55%-43%; House seat percentages are 82% Dem to 18% GOP

CA — went for Harris over Trump in 2024 by 62%-38%; House seat percentages are 74% Dem to 26% GOP

MA — went for Harris over Trump in 2024 by 61%-36%; House seat percentages are 100% Dem to 0% GOP (9 of 9)

NJ — went for Harris over Trump in 2024 by 52%-46%; House seat percentages are 75% Dem to 25% GOP

Of these 5 Dem states, MA repeats the TN anomaly: with only 9 House seats, the 100% Dem seats creates a 36% GOP deficit. The other four states produce GOP deficits of 16% (NY); 12% (CA); 21% (NJ), and, with the worst bias (25%), Illinois.

The math is clear: the 5 Dem states were around twice as biased against the GOP (averaging 22%) than the GOP states were against the Dems (12%). And that doesn’t count the recent, corrupt CA gerrymander, which added a double-digit increase in the existing GOP representational deficit in CA.

To top that off, the Dems’ ridiculous lies about evil White Witch Spanberger’s gerrymander proposal for Virginia are even clearer, given these numbers. When confronted about the transparent corruption in VA, Dems claimed that they were only redrawing their districts because Texas did their gerrymander – which they called “an illegitimate, partisan power-grab” –first.

But consider the numbers. Before the recent gerrymanders, both Texas and VA had basically evenly matched House seats and presidential vote parity. But when Texas’ gerrymander was done, the TX GOP was expected to gain 2 House seats, for a 5% advantage over the Dems. By contrast, the VA Dems were set to cut the 5 GOP House seats to only 1, creating a 36% advantage over the GOP.

So if gerrymandering for partisan advantage is corrupt, the Virginia Democrats are 7 times as corrupt as the Texas GOP, just as the 5 Dem states are twice as corrupt as the GOP.

The Dems may not get away with their attempted disenfranchising of Virginia voters, since a state judge declared it unconstitutional, citing several illegal aspects of that stunt. Hopefully a few judges in VA will be more honest than the national Democrats are.

But regardless, the gerrymandering debate shows that the Democrats are lying about their respect for democracy as much as they were lying when they pretended to believe that “no one is above the law.”

And it reinforces another constant in Democrat politics:

Whenever Dems are accusing the GOP of some form of corruption, you can bet your last dollar that they are actually more guilty of it themselves.

Que Mala/Crockett, 2028!

0-0-0

If you enjoyed this column, please share it, and click Subscribe (on the bottom of your phone screen, or the right side of your computer screen) to receive a notice when new columns post.

I’m Punching Up, at Elitists, From Now On (posted 11/22/24)

Okay, I’m not going to make fun of non-famous, non-influential, everyday leftists recording themselves losing their minds over the election any more.  Because it has just gotten sad.  And it’s actually sobering to see how many truly troubled and malfunctioning people are out there.

In a way, I can empathize with their situation, because the 2020 election was a horrific experience for me, as was Obama’s win in 2012, and the red-wave-less midterm in 2022.  It was nauseating to watch my country choose such feckless leaders and self-destructive policies in each of those elections.

But do you know what I – and CO, and CO nation, and pretty much all conservatives – didn’t do in any of those years? 

Record humiliating self-own videos during which we alternatingly cried, broke things and screamed obscenities, followed by vowing to leave the country, followed by ranting about how all Democrat voters were Nazis, followed by recording threats of violence against our fellow Americans who made the mistake of voting for Democrats. 

The flood of hysterical leftists who lost their minds in 2016 caught me by surprise.  The crazy ladies screaming at the sky, the beta males bawling so hard that their mascara was hopelessly smeared, the hordes of women who paraded around the mall with hats intentionally meant to resemble female genitalia.  In public!

But what has surprised me even more – and the trend has accelerated in this election cycle – is the number of seemingly high-functioning professionals who have shown themselves to be as emotionally dysregulated and mentally unstable as the marginalized fringe-dwellers making ridiculous TikTok videos.

There are a ton of truly disturbed teachers out there, for example, with dozens of high-profile cases of career-ending rants.  Examples include a male Moreno Valley, CA teacher hollering and swearing to his class about how he hates the patriarchy and “treasonous rapist and coward” Trump, and a self-recorded rant from a teacher in Connecticut threatening Trump voters with putting them “on a stretcher, gone forever” – and then later crying after getting fired.       

The most unexpected examples, though, are the truly elite people who have shown themselves to be either emotional basket-cases, or else incapable of calmly perceiving reality and logically analyzing basic arguments. Three of these have stood out to me.

The first is Dr. Laura Helmuth, who got a PhD in cognitive neuroscience from Berkeley and worked at prestigious jobs – Science Editor at the Smithsonian, and then at WAPO – before becoming editor-in-chief of the 175-year-old Scientific American.

Yet on election night, she posted a series of tweets that could have been written by the looniest of the dysfunctional drama queens on TikTok.   She expressed, “Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f–k them to the moon and back.”  She also apologized that her generation is “full of f**king fascists,” before slandering her home state of Indiana, which she left because of how “racist and sexist” it is. 

Before she resigned a few days later, she tried an unconvincing apology, claiming that, “I respect and value people across the political spectrum.”  Except for the mean, dumb, fascist, racist and sexist bigots, I guess. 

The second example is historian Heather Cox Richardson, who appeared on Jon Stewart’s podcast The Weekly Show.  I’d never seen his podcast, but wanted to see how his smarminess would be affected by the electoral beating, and she put on a world-class exhibition of point-missing and lie-repeating. 

She talked about how great our economy is now, but uninformed Trump voters just don’t know it.  She said that wages went up for working people under Biden, as if she didn’t understand what inflation is, or that it outpaced nominal wage gains. She said that people think that eggs cost too much, but she knows the real reasons: grocery stores have been price gouging, and there was a bird flu. 

But anyone familiar with grocery stores knows that they have amongst the skinniest profit margins of any business – usually around 1-2%.   And the bird flu?  Yes, I know that there was a bird flu and that several million chickens were killed on factory farms. 

But was there a cow flu that I don’t know about?  Because I am an ice cream addict, and the cost of my addiction has doubled in the last 4 years.   And was there an outbreak of popcorn weevils, because my popcorn is up about 60%?

 And was there a metastasizing elephantiasis affecting interest rates that has caused 30-year-mortgage rates to double under Biden?   Or a pandemic affecting the central nervous systems of millions of third-world residents, causing all of them to simultaneously experience a severe case of restless leg syndrome, such that they all found themselves walking thousands of miles up to and across our borders?

These are not low-IQ people, yet neither of them can bring themselves to consider that their premises are 180 degrees wrong.  They use all of their brain power to overlook the obvious – Que Mala is a hollow bag of cliches and word goulash, data shows that most people were better off under Trump – and manufacture self-flattering lies to explain Trump’s win.

Speaking of which, my favorite example is Allan Lichtman, the academic previously heralded as the “Nostradamus of Pollsters.”  I’ve previously written about him and his “13 Keys” that can supposedly predict any election’s outcome.  Lichtman was quite cocky pre-election, when he explained that his keys proved that Kamala would win.

Thus Nostradamus became Nostra-dumb-ass.

On Wednesday he went on Piers Morgan’s tv show with fellow leftist Cenk Uygur, and if you haven’t seen it yet, you must!  Lichtman goes first, and he gives two reasons why he missed this prediction:  1. The way the “spineless, cowardly Democrats openly and visibly trash[ed]” Biden, and 2. The huge amount of “disinformation” (he points to Elon as the chief culprit), which fooled the voters about the reality of the culture, the economy, and illegal immigrants. 

Of course the professor knew about both of those when he made his calculations.  Also, he makes the classic self-justifying move: the voters were wrong about reality, not him.

Cenk wasn’t having it.  He said that he had debated Lichtman before, and that Cenk was right and Lichtman and his keys were wrong.

Which was true, but absolutely the wrong thing to say.  Because an academic hates nothing more than clear statements of fact which destroy his own theory.  So Lichtman performed the clearest and most concise distillation of academic hubris I’ve ever seen.   

He snapped, “That’s a cheap shot and I won’t stand for it!”  When Cenk repeated the obvious point that Lichtman’s predictions were wrong, the prof hollered and waved his arms, saying, “I’ve only been a professor for 51 years, published 13 books.  How many books have you published?” 

Which is a double-strength shot of trying to cover up a painful truth with irrelevant credentialism: “Sure, a monkey throwing darts at battleground states on a map would have been more accurate than my predictions.  But just look at my curriculum vitae and the books I’ve written!  I’m a ‘DOCTOR,’ dammit, just like Dr. Jill!” 

Cenk responded succinctly.  “Okay, but brother, you got it wrong!  Preposterously and stupidly wrong!”  (By the way, anyone writing a post-mortem on this election now has the title: “The Democrat Campaign, 2024: Preposterously and Stupidly Wrong.”)

That caused Lichtman to regress back to middle-school, where I’m guessing he spent a lot of time stuffed into a locker: “Don’t call me stupid! I admitted I was wrong.  I don’t need YOU to call me stupid!”  (But apparently he does, because the whole nation has been calling him stupid for two weeks, and it doesn’t seem to be sinking in yet.)

(Also, nice Fredo Corleone impression, Doc: “I’m not stupid.  Not like everybody says.  I’m smart, and I want respect!”)

Cenk then reminded us that he’s no genius either, telling Lichtman that “[he] needs a big glass of shut-up juice.”  Which sounded as moronic in real life as it reads on your screen. 

Lichtman then folded his arms and talked over Cenk, saying, “I will not stand for personal attacks, for blasphemy against me.”

And Cenk closed us out with the only logical reaction: “Blasphemy against you?  Who the hell are you, Jesus Christ?  You loser!”

I opened this column saying that I wouldn’t make fun of normal, mentally fragile people who freaked out about this election any more, and I want to stick to that.  But arrogant and credentialed elitists who can’t think their way out of a wet paper bag are fair game! 

When they’re not dropping F bombs in tweets like a drunken bar-fly, they’re denigrating Trump voters and proclaiming that anyone who disagrees with them is blaspheming against the great god Marx and all of his righteous disciples.

They deserve all the scorn we can heap upon them, and I can’t wait until January!

Hamas delenda est!